| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dana Gilmour
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
   |
Posted - 2011.12.21 13:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yeah, one side having more than double, probably near triple the numbers (there seem to be some bugs on that log with many GS & friends Maelstroms appearing on the other side too) didn't have to do anything with the outcome.
Next time try to think before posting, less wasted time both for you and the rest. |
Dana Gilmour
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 14:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Xol'tan wrote:Dana Gilmour wrote:Yeah, one side having more than double, probably near triple the numbers (there seem to be some bugs on that log with many GS & friends Maelstroms appearing on the other side too) didn't have to do anything with the outcome. Next time try to think before posting, less wasted time both for you and the rest. Was 390 vs 310 Abbas, Guardians and Tengus vs Meals, Scimis and Scorps the log doesent show all the enemy who ran for it after seeing there Abbas insta poping to the crazy alpha. Oh i should probably mention that all the Abbadons where fitting 1400mm.
I see more than double Maels there on the log and I can't imagine half the Abaddons left the field without even fire once.
That is besides the point anyways. There are a lot of laser Abaddons out there, and countless fights where they won against Maels. Linking one out of thousands to make a point is beyond stupid. Strange how you don't see it, being that obvious and all. |
Dana Gilmour
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 15:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xol'tan wrote:In large fleet battles everyone fits projectiles be they Mealstrom or Abbado
This discussion suddenly became pointless.
|
Dana Gilmour
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 16:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Xol'tan wrote:Whats piontless is fitting Rails in a fleet battle.
You're not too bright are you? And can't really decide what your point is. |
Dana Gilmour
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 18:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Lol, what a tard. Blob = arty or gtfo. Biomass yourself. 
The fail is strong in this one, he already reached the point of no return. |
Dana Gilmour
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 18:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:
The problem is that the damage vs. falloff equation is applied to the normalized falloff of a weapon (ie. 0 to 100%), not the absolute falloff, in km. This means that a weapon system which benefits from extended falloff, such as ACs with Tracking Enhancers, will be much more effective out to greater ranges than other weapon systems, given roughly equivalent base damage.
There's your problem right there. Blasters damage and tracking are way better than ACs.
|
Dana Gilmour
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 15:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cheshire Katt wrote:Naomi Knight wrote:
why do you want to nerf poormatar?:O
Oh hai, it's Naomi Knight. ***** of Eve-O. Everyone gets her attention, and it's usually filthy and hard to scrub away! Yah. that was a useless post for the sake of insulting. Considering who it was aimed towards though, I believe it was completely worth it. She reminds me of... oh what's his name... jojo or something that used to ***** around all the Eve O threads wanting to nerf Gallente.
About Naomi, here's some options:
- if he/she is a troll, would be a rather bad one but still, no harm done, just some mediocre trolling;
- if he/she is a 13 year old kid starved for attention and not very bright, oh well, kids are kids, they can be annoying and silly brats but again, there's still hope it can turn out OK;
- but if he/she is an adult and is trying to have a discussion and be serious, then it's a very sad thing really. |
| |
|